The New York Times The New York Times New York Region Where to stay and
what to do in Europe


NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, jpenido - Member Center - Log Out
Site Search:  


NYT Store
Photo: Central Park after blizzard, 2003
Photo: Central Park after blizzard, 2003
Learn More.

Have you tried one of Mario Batali’s famous restaurants?   Plan a trip to New York City to reserve your table at Lupa‚ Babbo or Otto Enoteca Pizzeria.

Check out the NYC travel guide.
Browse more U.S. city guides.

City Trash Plan Forgoes Trucks, Favoring Barges


Published: October 7, 2004

James Estrin/The New York Times
The mayor's plan calls for reopening a waste transfer station on East 91st Street in Manhattan, where trash would be loaded onto barges.

Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & Permissions Reprints & Permissions
Single Page Format Single-Page Format


A Plan for Trash
Graphic: A Plan for Trash
Page One: Thursday, Oct. 7, 2004
Discovery Times Video: Page One: Thursday, Oct. 7, 2004




Recycling of Waste Materials

Waste Management Incorporated

Natural Resources Defense Council

Three years after the closing of the mammoth Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island, the Bloomberg administration has drawn up a 20-year plan to deal with the city's residential waste by shipping the bulk of it elsewhere by barge, officials who have been briefed on the plan said yesterday.

The city has struggled for years with how to handle the 11,000 tons of waste per day that used to go to Fresh Kills, and since it was closed the city has been relying on trucks to cart most of its garbage out of state, a costly solution that generates pollution and traffic congestion. In an announcement planned for today, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg was expected to address those concerns by proposing renovation of four waste transfer stations along the city's waterfront: two in Brooklyn, one in Queens and one on the Upper East Side of Manhattan.

The plan is the culmination of a wider strategy that includes committing the city to recycling more of its garbage and shipping its commercial refuse away through a pier on the West Side of Manhattan - proposals announced over the last two weeks.

The city did not release any estimates of what the plan would cost or when it would take effect.

One goal appears to be to keep one borough's garbage from becoming another's burden, as is the case now, when garbage trucks rumble throughout the city carting trash mainly to points west of New York. While Manhattan, Queens and Brooklyn would have marine transfer stations, where trash can be dumped onto barges, Staten Island and the Bronx would rely on trains to cart trash away.

In recent years, the cost of handling waste has skyrocketed, as the city has depended on private transfer stations and private out-of-state haulers. By reopening its own transfer stations, the city hopes to reduce its dependence on private companies and lower its transport costs. With the marine transfer stations, the city also aims to gain more control over who carries the garbage away and where it is taken.

The plan, whose details have not been released publicly, will likely please residents of the neighborhoods that would have reduced garbage truck traffic, as well as those of areas like Harlem that had been considered potential sites for transfer stations. But the mayor's proposal will likely trigger a fight on the City Council, particularly over the reopening of the waste transfer station on East 91st Street in Manhattan, which lies in the district represented by the Council's speaker, Gifford Miller.

"I'm glad that they listened to the concerns that I raised about the West Harlem site, but they didn't listen when it came to the 91st Street station, which makes no sense at all," said Mr. Miller, who is likely to run for mayor in 2005. "Both of these are densely residential areas, and if it's a bad idea to open a station in one place, then it's also a bad idea to open it in the other."

The plan is subject to the Council's approval.

Under the plan, the city would avoid reopening the marine transfer station in the Bronx by signing a long-term contract with Waste Management, a major trash-hauling company that runs a station on the Harlem River, in the Mott Haven neighborhood, where the trash is shipped by rail. And while much of Manhattan's trash would leave the city by barge once the 91st Street station was rebuilt, some would be trucked directly from the curbside to a trash-to-energy plant near Newark under a long-term contract with an incineration company there.

Last week, the city announced its plan for handling commercial waste, which would involve reopening the marine transfer station on West 59th Street in Manhattan. The city also intends to open the Gansevoort station in Greenwich Village, on the Hudson River near 12th Street, which would be used exclusively to handle recyclable materials from Manhattan.

The trash problem has been a particularly vexing one for Mayor Bloomberg, who announced in July 2002 his intention to reopen eight marine transfer stations, only to backpedal after being faced with staunch community opposition and realizing that the transfer stations could not simply be reopened but would need to be demolished, expanded and rebuilt at a much higher cost.

Download Today's New York Times to Your Desktop.
1 | 2 | Next>>

.NEW JERSEY & CO.; New EcoComplex Is All Kinds of Green  (April 22, 2001)  $
.From Mother's Ugly Duckling To Chic and Expensive Swan  (May 19, 1999)  $
.INVESTING IT; For Wall Street, Increasing Evidence that Green Begets Green  (July 19, 1998)  $
.Mr. Fisk Builds His Green House  (February 15, 1996)  $
Find more results for Environment and Recycling of Waste Materials

. Report on Day Care Death Finds Flaws in System
. 20-Year Plan for City's Trash Entails $340 Million Renovation of 4 Marine Transfer Stations
. Bleak Landscapes, Green Produce
. Lawyers' Group Sues City Over Arrests of Protesters
Go to New York Region

Schwab portfolio
upgrade is here.